On 18 January 2025 at 02:06, Santiago Vila wrote: | El 17/1/25 a las 20:30, Dirk Eddelbuettel escribió: | > Hm, build log are fine: | > | > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=quantlib-swig | > | > What are you doing differently? | | Hi. Heraclitus once said "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the | same river and he's not the same man." | | I'm building packages in unstable, as I always do, but as you have already guessed, | the unstable of today is not the same as the unstable of 13 days ago.
Yeah. Clearly my bug. "Sometimes" / "most of the time" QuantLib comes with a release right after the RC. Here, in hindsight, I should have used "experimental". Will do next. | Sometimes I know why something which built ok in the past does not build ok | anymore, but very often I do not (and people in general should not expect me | to know). The devscripts package has a program called debbisect which may be | used to answer such kind of questions (i.e. "why it built ok 13 days ago but | it does not build ok today?"). Try it one day, it's great. Oh I think I know per the second email I sent. I am mixing 1.36 and 1.37-rc between QuantLib and QuantLib-SWIG and that ain't working. My bad. Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
