On Thu, Jan 09, 2025 at 03:02:56PM +0000, Simon McVittie wrote: > I believe debian-design and open-font-design-toolkit are ignorable for the > same reasons mentioned in #1090954, where Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > "TTBOMK restricting dependencies to specific archs in Arch: all > packages is not possible in the first place with our current > tooling" and Paul agreed. These metapackages will just not be installable > on s390x. In practice I don't think anyone is going to choose to use a > $10K+ mainframe for visual design or font design.
I think the set it's worked down to is fine. I've processed this removal. Clearly waiting isn't going to get us any better results here, I think this is a fine state to move forward in. > gimp-texturize was removed from s390x in #1090955, but seems to have been > rebuilt since then (?) possibly as a side-effect of unrelated binNMUs - > is there something that we can do to make the removal "stick", or do > we need to keep re-requesting its removal in a separate bug until the > stars align, or can the ftp team intervene? I reckon this may need a binNMU to drop s390x; a partial removal won't stop a package from re-adding it later; so the order here may be another binNMU to drop the arch, file another rm (feel free to ping me when it's filed) and we can process it again. No worries. paultag -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Paul Tagliamonte <paultag> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ https://people.debian.org/~paultag | https://pault.ag/ ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ Debian, the universal operating system. ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀ 4096R / FEF2 EB20 16E6 A856 B98C E820 2DCD 6B5D E858 ADF3
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
