Hi Paul,
On 5 January 2025 at 21:59, Paul Gevers wrote: | On 05-01-2025 21:54, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | > | Please note that generally we prefer not to have an explicit | > | architectures list in the Architecture field, it's considered better to | > | have the build which fails just in case people want to inspect the logs. | > | The explicit Architecture field is best used where the build would | > | succeed but yield useless binaries. | > | > Yes but please see previous email. I tried three different approaches to fix | > this, none work. It is the last resort. | | I read it, and I think I understood it. What I meant is that you don't | need to list it, all you need to do is request removal of the binaries | of that arch. Doh!! Thanks for the cluebat, I once knew that. Much better. If and when then arch comes back (somehow, via a patch, changes to toolchain, ...) it just fills in. | Once, there are no binaries on an arch, it's "fine" that it FTBFS there. Yup! Will do. Thanks again, Dirk -- dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | e...@debian.org
