Hello, On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 11:24:26PM +0100, bl...@debian.org wrote: > Package: lpr > Severity: important > User: bl...@debian.org > Usertags: missing-systemd-service > > Dear Maintainer(s), > > lpr has been flagged by Lintian as shipping a sysv-init script > without a corresponding systemd unit file. [...]
I've implemented this (and a whole bunch of other fixups that seemed needed) in a COMPLETELY UNTESTED branch that I've pushed to: https://salsa.debian.org/debian/lpr/-/commits/lintian-shellcheck-and-policy-fixes Any help with reviewing and testing these changes would be appreciated! If my screaming above was not clear enough; I've only build-tested the package. Not even installed it. This is all implemented as at the best of my ability with absolutely no testing done (yet) what so ever! I'm not a user of lpr/lpd myself and lack deeper understanding of its inner workings. The above branch includes a bunch of fixes for unreported policy related violations. Maybe it's better if this package was removed (since I assume better alternatives exists that are hopefully better maintained). If the maintainer (who haven't touched the package in a decade) disagrees, please state so! If not removed, maybe the package should atleast be orphaned?! Regards, Andreas Henriksson PS. It would likely be a good idea to also convert debian/rules to use dh sequencer.
