Hi Niels, thanks for the bug report.
On Fri, Jan 03, 2025 at 05:44:28AM +0100, Niels Thykier wrote:
> I think we should add a mention of `architecture-properties` next to
> `Architecture`. Maybe something like:
>
> """
> Additionally, if you believe the list of supported architectures is pretty
> constant, you should change any to a list of supported architectures in
> debian/control or add a Build-Depends on one of the
> `architecture-properties` provided names such as `architecture-is-64-bit`.
> This way, the build will not be performed on the relevant architectures, and
> indicate this to a human reader.
> """
sounds good to me.
> This also changes the note about the build "will fail". In my understanding,
> the buildds will **not** try these builds (anymore?). At least, the buildds
> now say `$ARCH is not present in the architecture list set by the
> maintainer` rather than showing a build log. For the newly added snippet
> about `architecture-properties`, they instead goes into a "permanent"
> `Dep-Wait` state.
> Either way, saying "the build will fail also" feels like a stretch to me
> given it stops "before" the build ever happens.
the build s#will fail#will not be attempted# sounds like a straightwarforward
change to me.
patches or commits most welcome!
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Every time you see the word "smart" used to describe a device, replace it with
"surveillance." Surveillance watch. Surveillance streetlights. Surveillance
oven. Surveillance toilet. Surveillance car. Surveillance city. (@mollyali)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
