Hello Paul, On Sat 07 Dec 2024 at 08:29am +01, Paul Gevers wrote:
> I *think* you're aware, but maybe I'm mixing up history: while this is true, > the operators of ci.d.n (me and terceiro) can give access to a testbed on the > actual hardware where we run our tests. We'd need to agree on a date/time > because in the way it works, either of us needs to remain on-line at that > time. Normally we'd give you the testbed where the test already ran, but > failed, for immediate inspection or other use you find necessary for > debugging. I didn't know about this, so thank you for mentioning it. I don't think that I am willing to schedule volunteer time like this for this particular bug. I have an RFH out for sbcl, and I'm selective in what I work on. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
