Quoting Peter Green (2024-12-18 01:38:19) > Package: sccache > Version: 0.9.0-1 > > I am currently looking at updating rust-backtrace and related packages > to the latest version, backtrace itself is not semver-breaking but > a number of it's dependencies are. > > backtrace 0.3.69 -> 0.3.74 > addr2line 0.21.4 -> 0.24.2 > object 0.32.3 -> 0.36.5 > gimli 0.28.1 -> 0.31.1 > ruzstd 0.5.0 -> 0.7.3 > > sccache in particular depends on rust-object. > > After bumping the dependency I got a failure to find > macho::FatHeader::parse , checking the upstream changelog I found > the following entry. > > Replaced macho::FatHeader::parse, macho::FatHeader::parse_arch32, > and macho::FatHeader::parse_arch64 with read::macho::MachOFatFile, > read::macho::MachOFatFile32 and read::macho::MachOFatFile64. #623 > > After doing some exploration of the new API there doesn't seem to > be a way to try to parse a FatHeader without knowing before hand > if it is the 32 or 64 bit version. So I made the code try both > one after the other (and if both fail, it assumes it's not a > fat binary). > > After applying the patch, I got the same number of test failures > as reported in bug 1090040
Thanks for the bugreport, and the (later) patch. I am with weak network access the next week, and this seems of lesser priority due to sccache already broken for other reasons. If you prefer faster processing, then either nudge me some more or do a zero-day NMU, which is fine by me given the narrow changes isolated to the provided patch. Kind regards, - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
