* Santiago Vila <sanv...@debian.org> [241218 15:12]: > > Fewer than 20 packages will need changes, some of these packages > > have been asked to be removed themselves. If we have no immediate > > urgency in getting rid of src:dh-buildinfo, I think it's manageable. > > Hi. There was no immediate urgency in getting rid of src:dh-buildinfo, > but if I'm not mistaken, those 20 packages, which currently > have BD: dh-buildinfo and explicitly call dh_buildinfo in debian/rules, > will now FTBFS regardless of src:dh-buildinfo existing or not > (due to the Provides added to debhelper).
I've NMUed all packages that were going to FTBFS, and had no open RM bug or FTBFSed already. > If that's actually the case (can someone please confirm?), then it > would seem that we could ask for src:dh-buildinfo to be removed now. Yes, dh-buildinfo can now be removed. > (Probably by reassigning this bug to ftp.debian.org). (Might be best to clone + reassign, but leaving this to whomever does it.) Chris
