Andreas Tille writes ("Bug#1089975: ITS: xfonts-traditional"):
> Hi IanHi. Yes. One concern I have is that, err, how to put this: I think some people may consider xfonts-traditional "obsolete" or "cruft" or "wrong" or something. If you're confident that those kind of issues aren't going to arise then, please carry on. Regardless, I very much welcome the admin work you are doing here and am happy to have the repo hosted on salsa. I trust you have found the package's proper git history, despite the lack of vcs-git headers? dgit fetch will have it, plus any NMU(s). IDK what the fonts team's policy is about Uploaders etc., but I would like to continue to be informed, at least, about plans for this package, without having to subscribe to and monitor a more general list. > PS: I remember that you wanted me to use dgit for the psutils upload. > I confirm I'll do so in case you might accept the ITS. ;-) Thanks. My opinion is that all uploads should be done with dgit where possible. But I don't feel entitled to request this unless I'm the maintainer, or something. Ian. -- Ian Jackson <ijack...@chiark.greenend.org.uk> These opinions are my own. Pronouns: they/he. If I emailed you from @fyvzl.net or @evade.org.uk, that is a private address which bypasses my fierce spamfilter.
