On Sun, 11 Jun 2006, Daniel Kobras wrote: > I'm still concerned about the change, though. You're removing the > logo first, then add a different one. Are you certain that this is > sufficiently distinct from modifying the logo, which is not > permitted by the license?
The logo itself is totally removed before I even begin to add back the new logo. There's no patching at all going on in the removal (just a few rm's and a regex which removes it totally.) Since at no point do we ever modify the logo, it should be perfectly ok. [And we definetly don't release in any form, be it the diff.gz or the orig.tar.gz a version of the logo, which was the case in the sarge release.] > Also, can you please add a note to debian/copyright about the logo > change? Will do. [I should probably also indicate who actually did that logo originally.] Don Armstrong -- The game of science is, in principle, without end. He who decides one day that scientific statements do not call for any further test, and that they can be regarded as finally verified, retires from the game. -- Sir Karl Popper _The Logic of Scientific Discovery_ ยง11 http://www.donarmstrong.com http://rzlab.ucr.edu
