El 14/12/24 a las 14:15, Andreas Tille escribió: > Hi Santiago, > > Am Sat, Dec 14, 2024 at 07:38:40AM -0300 schrieb Santiago Ruano Rincón: > > > thank you for working on LTS! Intake is replacing a link to some online > > > version of bootstrap3 to avoid privacy breaches of the user[1]. I admit > > > we have no capacity to port the code to any later bootstrap version and > > > my plan would be to simply drop the patch and rather use the online > > > version. > > > > To check if I understand correctly: your plan is to drop [1] as a way to > > get rid off the dependency? > > This would be ony way to enable Debian getting rid of the bootstrap3 > package (not to bring the package intake in a better state).
Remember that this is a bug in the upstream code. Have you already tried contacting upstream to ask them if they could move to bootstrap 5? [snip] > > I am CC'ing Daniel Baumann <daniel.baum...@progress-linux.org>: would it > > help maintainers and upstreams if we create a wiki page with info/tips > > from projects that have already moved to bootstrap 5, and that could > > serve as an example data base? > > So making Debian upstream of quite a view packages (like intake)? No, I don't mean to make debian upstream, but to help upstream (or maintainers) providing examples of other porting efforts. > It > might help in principle, but we do not have the capacity to do the > porting work. Cheers, -- Santiago
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
