Dear наб, Am Sat, Dec 07, 2024 at 06:58:52PM +0100 schrieb наб: > I'm interested in salvaging your package rcs-blame, in accordance with the > Package Salvaging procedure outlined in the Developers Reference[1]. > Your package meets the criteria for this process, and I would love to > assist in preserving and maintaining it. As the Salvage process > suggests, here is a list of the criteria that apply, in my opinion: > > - NMUs (more than one NMU in a row). > - Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the > maintainer. > - Upstream has released several versions, but despite there being > a bug entry asking for it, it has not been packaged. > - There are QA issues with the package.
that's all true, but are you an rcs user or have you ever been one?
because you don't give any reason why the package is useful to you or
anyone else today - you just gave reasons why it's ok to transfer
maintainership, which in itself has no value if the package has no value
today anymore.
I'm very happy about QA efforts in general, but some cleanups IMO achieve
the opposite of cleanup: they prevent removal of things which should be
cleaned up and removed.
--
cheers,
Holger
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
⠈⠳⣄
Climate Justice is that moment when we can start looking each other in the
eyes again. (Luisa Neubauer)
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
