On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 08:02:50PM +0200, Sebastian Leske wrote: > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 02:06:01PM +0200, Mattia Dongili wrote: > > Hello, > > > > thanks for your suggestions. > > > > On Sun, Jun 11, 2006 at 12:16:49PM +0200, Sebastian Leske wrote: > > > Package: cpufreqd > > > Version: 2.0.0-1 > > [...] > > > The texts are, of course, only proposals, which may not even be correct > > > :-). If the texts grow longer, it might be better to put them into a > > > file under /usr/share/doc/cpufreqd and refer to that in the dialog > > > texts. > > > > Yes, I'd rather put them there, in README.Debian. > > That may actually be a better place for them. > > But in that case please add a short note to the debconf failure > messages, so people will know to look into README.Debian, something like > "Additional configuration may be needed to activate this feature. > See /usr/share/doc/cpufreqd/README.Debian for more information."
yes, I thought about that just a little after sending my previous mail :) -- mattia :wq! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
