I decided to name the new package susv5. Why? Because that's what the upstream tarball was named :P
I'm going to assume that if upstream names their tarball like that, the spec probably is susv5, so no need to worry. Kind regareds, David Weinehall
- Bug#1088981: sus: please add package for POSIX.1-... Christoph Anton Mitterer
- Bug#1088981: sus: please add package for POS... David Weinehall
- Bug#1088981: sus: please add package for... Christoph Anton Mitterer
- Bug#1088981: Package naming David Weinehall
