On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 06:15:57PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 19, 2024 at 03:35:21PM +0200, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 10, 2024 at 06:03:24PM +0200, Helmut Grohne wrote:
> > > A. Multi-Arch: foreign is a lie
> > All the examples of yours will immediatelly fail to build anything with
> > it. So what harm is done?
> This is practically untrue. Even with current unstable packages, the
> sparc (32) bootstrap still succeeds.
I don't understand what succeeds. Because missing asm/* headers pretty
much makes it impossible to use anything from linux/*. So the bootstrap
either have it's own headers or it will bail out if it tries to include
any kernel interface.
Can you please share the log for it?
> > But now you can have a port without hand patched linux that is built in
> > a non-standard way and relying on internal and unstable package API,
> > just be talking and getting it added to the package first.
> Fair enough. Please add arc, cksy, mipsr6el, sh3, sparc, and
> musl-linux-any. Thanks in advance.
Please make proper requests that are actionable.
- arc: in dpkg. bootstrap plan is where?
- cksy: not in dpkg, so not actionable, as triplet is not known.
bootstrap plan is where?
- mipsr6el: which one do you mean?
/usr/include/mipsisa64r6el-linux-gnuabi64?
- sh3: was never in debian. bootstrap plan?
- sparc: was removed years ago. bootstrap plan?
- musl-linux-any: how is that supposed to work?
Bastian
--
No one can guarantee the actions of another.
-- Spock, "Day of the Dove", stardate unknown
