Hi Michael On Sat, 30 Nov 2024 at 21:25, Michael R. Crusoe <cru...@debian.org> wrote: > While preparing uploads of the BioConductor 3.20 r-bioc-* packages to the > experimental distribution, I accidentally uploaded a newer version of > r-bioc-biocstyle (2.34.0+dfsg-1) to unstable. > > Shall I fix this by rolling back the change with an upload of a > r-bioc-biocstyle source package version "2.34.0+really2.32.1+dfsg-1" to > unstable (and corresponding "2.34.0+really2.34.0+dfsg-1" version to > experimental)? > > Or shall I wait for the bioc-3.20 transition's [0] blockers [1][2] to be > fixed and permission for the new r-bioc-* packages to be uploaded to unstable?
I don't think this is worth reverting. It cannot migrate to testing as it is, and even if it would, we could just add a block hint. > Sorry about the mess I made! No problem! Regards Graham
