Bug#1088609: blueman: Recommend both audio back-ends

[Christopher Schramm]

Hey, thanks for the suggestion. I might be missing something and there 
definitely seems room for improvements, but there is usually no 
situation where having both packages makes sense. For Bluetooth audio, 
you need Bluetooth support for your system's sound server and that is 
typically either PulseAudio or PipeWire, definitely not both.

With the alternatives in place, if the sound server in use already has 
Bluetooth support installed, nothing happens when the recommendations 
get checked. If it does not, none of the packages should be installed 
already and from my understanding pulseaudio-module-bluetooth will be 
chosen simply because it's first in the list. This is unfortunate for 
PipeWire users, but pulseaudio still seems more like a default 
throughout installations to me, so the opposite does not make sense 
either. Recommending both would just mean that users will get Bluetooth 
support installed for a sound server that they do not have / use, even 
if theirs is already good. At least the pulseaudio module even pulls in 
the whole sound server.