On Wed, 27 Nov 2024 09:29:44 +0700 Arnaud Rebillout <arna...@kali.org>
wrote:
>
> ```
> Building dependency tree...
> libxfixes3-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H >
can't be satisfied!
> libxft2-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H > can't
be satisfied!
> libxinerama1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H >
can't be satisfied!
> libxkbfile1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H >
can't be satisfied!
> libxrandr2-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H >
can't be satisfied!
> libxrender1-udeb:arm64 Depends on libx11-xcb1:arm64 < none @un H >
can't be satisfied!
> ```
I checked the latest builds for libxft2-udeb at
https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=xft.
We can see that:
- amd64: was built against libx11-6 amd64 2:1.8.7-1+b1
- arm64: was built against libx11-6 arm64 2:1.8.10-1
Same with other packages after a quick check.
I wonder if the "fix" is just to request a binNMU for all
the packages above. What do you think?
Arnaud
