# for some reason, bugs to udebs do not shop up on # tracker nor on ddpo, thus reassigning for visibility reassign 1087324 haveged thanks
On 11/11/24 13:08, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > haveged doesn't start at all in d-i, and that's not an apparmor issue > (#1087318): I'll check, thanks for reporting. > While haveged is supposed to be less critical than it used to be at the > time it was added to the installer, I don't remember seeing a study > making it clear it can be removed. I think the udeb should be removed right after trixie, it's only useful in very limited edge cases when running specific workloads (of installed systems). > At this point of the release cycle, I'd rather see haveged fixed anyway. of course. Regards, Daniel
