Dear Niels, Am Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:33:21AM +0100 schrieb Niels Thykier: > Christoph Brinkhaus: > > Package: debhelper > > Version: 13.20 > > Severity: minor > > > > Dear Niels, > > > > while updating the strings in the debhelper documentation the l10 > > documentation team noticed a few issues in the text which I report > > in the attached text file. > > > > Just for reference: The update of the german translation has been > > reported in a separate report as > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1083169. > > The remarks listed below appear in the po template as FIXME, too. > > The first two strings seem to be contradictionary to be. > > The other ones are just typos or about formatting, nothing serious. > > > > In case the documentation is updated I will be happy to update the > > translation accordingly. > > > > Thank you very much for maintaining this huge project, > > Christoph Brinkhaus > > Hi Christoph > > Thanks for the feedback. > > > No. 1 > > # FIXME In #: debhelper-compat-upgrade-checklist.pod:276 > > # it triggers a warning to use... Is just the context different? > > # Please clarify. > > #. type: textblock > > #: debhelper-compat-upgrade-checklist.pod:59 > > msgid "" > > "It is now an error to use a packaging file without the package prefix for " > > "B<--name> even if the source package only produces one binary package. As " > > "example, if you had a F<debian/bar.service> with the following snippet in " > > "F<debian/rules>:" > > > > No. 2 > > # FIXME It is now triggers a warning → Now it triggers a warning > > # FIXME In #: debhelper-compat-upgrade-checklist.pod:59 > > # it is an error to use... Is just the context different? > > # Please clarify. > > #. type: textblock > > #: debhelper-compat-upgrade-checklist.pod:276 > > msgid "" > > "It is now triggers a warning to use a packaging file without the package " > > "prefix for B<--name> even if the source package only produces one binary " > > "package. As example, if you had a F<debian/bar.service> with the following > > " > > "snippet in F<debian/rules>:" > > > > I am not sure I understand the contradiction here. The message is for two > different compat levels (14 vs. 15). In compat 14 (no. 2) the behavior > triggers a warning. In compat 15 (no. 1), the warning is replaced with an > error which breaks the build.
Dear Niels, yes you are right. I have overlooked that the message is for two different compat levels. Thank you very much for the explanation. [...] Kind regards, Christoph -- Ist die Katze gesund schmeckt sie dem Hund.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
