Control: tags 1086553 pending
Control: tags 1086554 pending

Oldřich Jedlička wrote...

> I am testing various clevis implementations (thus using more recent custom
> build) and I think it would be good for clevis-initramfs package to depend
> on initramfs-tools-core rather than on initramfs-tools. This would allow
> having both clevis-initramfs and clevis-dracut versions installed at the same
> time.

This seems sensible. There's just one bit of information I needed to
answer a question possible other people will ask as well: Will this
break regular usage, especially (re-)creating the respective initramfs
for a new kernel and/or clevis version?

The answer is "no", as (for amd64) linux-image-amd64 depends on some
versioned kernel package (currenty linux-image-6.11.5-amd64), and that
depends on initramfs-tools | linux-initramfs-tool, and dracut provides
the latter. So the initramfs-tools (or dracut) will still be required
despite clevis-{initramfs,dracut} no longer depend on them.

Upload of the new clevis upstream version will follow soon.

    Christoph

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to