Hi, On 01-11-2024 00:04, Nicholas D Steeves wrote:
Where can I find more information about these alleged flaky amd64 autopkgtests. As far as I an tell the current issues are related to python3-defaults from experimental.
E.g. https://ci.debian.net/packages/v/vorta/testing/amd64/53739823/ (found trivially from https://ci.debian.net/packages/v/vorta/testing/amd64/)
Is the use of "xvfb" still best practices, or should it be switched to use something else?
I'm not aware of alternatives.
Is there a NEWS file or changelog that I can follow to remain appraised of what our infra is fuzzing for and what changes have been made?
I'm not sure what you mean with fuzzing. My normal understanding of that word doesn't apply to what we do.
There is no specific file to follow on our configuration changes, but you could watch for commits here:
https://salsa.debian.org/ci-team/debian-ci-config/ Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
