> Looks like the updated version of gcc-avr is dramatically worse for code > size than the previous version (based on gcc 7.3!). I looked at the > generated code and it also looks worse from a quality perspective.
I've just tested the tip of gcc development and code generation for avr has been fixed there. I'll see if there's a single commit which could be applied to our existing compiler or whether we just need to wait until gcc-avr is updated. -- -keith
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature