> Looks like the updated version of gcc-avr is dramatically worse for code
> size than the previous version (based on gcc 7.3!). I looked at the
> generated code and it also looks worse from a quality perspective.

I've just tested the tip of gcc development and code generation for avr
has been fixed there. I'll see if there's a single commit which could be
applied to our existing compiler or whether we just need to wait until
gcc-avr is updated.

-- 
-keith

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to