[sorry for the delay, you didn't CC me, so I had to get this off the webview]
On Mon, Oct 21, 2024 at 04:42:41PM +0200, Sven Geuer wrote: > On Sat, 19 Oct 2024 16:53:32 +0200 наб <nabijaczlew...@nabijaczleweli.xyz> > wrote: > > I'd like to remove View-OS and thus use fuseiso to replace fuseiso9660 > > with a transitional package, and AFAICT this is the only API difference. > > > > Please consider the patches below that allow -f, -s, -o opt > > before the arguments. > > Thanks for providing more information about what's your motivation > regarding this bug report. > > The patch to the command line parsing looks quite "hack-ish" to me, > though might be acceptable. Checking... fuseiso's option parsing is already hacky, but reformatting it to the modern fuse_opt_*() idiom in a patch would be much harder. > To fully substitute fuseiso9660, all options listed in its manpage > should be made available in fuseiso (needs to extend the command line > parser only, if I am not mistaken) and be added to fuseiso's manpage. fuseiso9660 has -o opt,... + -hV + -dfs fuseiso has -o opt,... + -h + -dfs AFAICT, the only difference is that fuseiso cares about the location of -ofs, and this patch makes it not do this. And actually the manual lies about fuseiso9660 having -V ‒ it doesn't. All the -o stuff in fuseiso9660(1) is consumed by libfuse, and fuseiso9660 itself doesn't use them. > Would you be able to provide a patch for this? I'm pretty sure all extant fuseiso9660 users could be replaced with fuseiso, with the patches in my post above. I may be missing something though. Best, наб
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
