reopen 370087 thanks Re: Debian Bug Tracking System 2006-06-09 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >> Please include the packages description on packages.qa.debian.org. > > > > Why?
Sorry for the late-to-the-party message - I'd like to strongly support Goswin's request. The (short) package description is essential information, all the other stuff doesn't make much sense if you can't even remotely say what the package does. Adding the description as mouse-over titles to DDPO made it much more fun to use for me, so I'd love to have it also in the PTS. (Frankly, when I want to know the status of a source package, I'm using developer.php?package= instead of the PTS right now just because of that feature.) Yes, the information is only a few clicks away, but this argument obsoletes any information in the PTS. > > 2/ The descriptions are space consuming and do not fit in the PTS which > > gives an overview of the status and provides links to all the more verbose > > content. I'm sure the short description fits somewhere, e.g. in <small> below the "Overview of..." heading. Christoph -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.df7cb.de/
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
