Package: racket
Version: 8.14+dfsg1-1
Severity: important
X-Debbugs-Cc: humberto.or...@gmail.com

Dear Maintainer,

*** Reporter, please consider answering these questions, where appropriate ***

   * What led up to the situation?

   The racket (and drracket) package runs extremely slowly on an aarch64 
machine, sometime during this semester. (In August it ran fine). The same 
version of racket compiled for other 
   systems (termux, guix) work as expected.

   * What exactly did you do (or not do) that was effective (or
     ineffective)?

$ time /usr/bin/racket -e '(exit)'

   * What was the outcome of this action?

real    3m24.268s
user    3m23.567s
sys     0m0.643s

   * What outcome did you expect instead?

$ time .guix-profile/bin/racket -e '(exit)'

real    0m2.270s
user    0m2.044s
sys     0m0.227s

-- System Information:
Debian Release: trixie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: arm64 (aarch64)

Kernel: Linux 6.7.9-reform2-arm64 (SMP w/4 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_WARN, TAINT_CRAP, TAINT_OOT_MODULE, 
TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

Versions of packages racket depends on:
ii  libc6          2.40-3
ii  liblz4-1       1.9.4-1+b2
ii  libtinfo6      6.5-2
ii  racket-common  8.14+dfsg1-1
ii  zlib1g         1:1.3.dfsg+really1.3.1-1

Versions of packages racket recommends:
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-2.0-0             2.42.12+dfsg-1
ii  libgdk-pixbuf-xlib-2.0-0        2.40.2-3+b2
ii  libglib2.0-0t64 [libglib2.0-0]  2.80.2-2
ii  libgtk2.0-0                     2.24.33-3
ii  libjpeg62-turbo                 1:2.1.5-2+b2
ii  libpangocairo-1.0-0             1.52.1+ds-1
ii  libpng16-16t64 [libpng16-16]    1.6.43-5
ii  libssl3t64 [libssl3]            3.3.1-6
ii  racket-doc                      8.14+dfsg1-1

racket suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

Reply via email to