also sprach Michael Biebl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006.06.09.1600 +0200]: > I set the priority to wishlist as I don't consider this as an important bug. > The reason why I don't want to use debconf at first place is, that imho > the software should just work out of the box. It's better imho to > provide sane defaults and give more experienced users the possibility to > configure it to their liking.
Sounds like a low-priority debconf question. Anyway, I still oppose to making the default just shut down unless you know how to handle it properly. > Also, the typical use case for > powersaved/kpowersave is a laptop user running KDE. No, it's not. powersaved can be run by anyone. > I won't discard the idea of using debconf but I'll have to think > about it first because imo it complicates the maintenance of the > package significantly without much gain. Does it? Come on... should I submit the patch? -- Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list! .''`. martin f. krafft <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> : :' : proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info `. `'` `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)
