Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-10-12 18:40:03) > On 13/10/2024 00:23, Jonas Smedegaard wrote: > > Quoting Blair Noctis (2024-10-12 17:34:58) > (...) > >> Well, not only. rustls & friends also need an update, which is a > >> non-trivial > >> transition by itself, needing some careful planning and work. Or we could > >> downgrade and wait until the day comes.. > > > > As I see it, updating rust-rustls is only non-trivial if done > > all-at-once, which I find a very bad approach (as I do for base64 as > > well, in case anyone cares for my opinion). > > > > What I expect to be trivial is to introduce a newer branch that other > > packages can then begin depending on at their own pace, and then when > > sensible drop the older branch. > > Could you elaborate a bit on the "branch"? Like, a versioned package (e.g. > rustls-0.21 vs rustls 0.23)? That'd mean NEW travels each time a transition > happens. FTP masters are quite fast these days, but I don't really want to > increase their load.
Yes, but I prefer to do so at a bugreport filed against src:rust-rustls, since this conversation is drifting too far away from the issue on topic for this bugreport. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ * Sponsorship: https://ko-fi.com/drjones [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc
Description: signature
