On Fri, 2024-10-04 at 20:57 +0200, Michael Biebl wrote: > My recommendation would be to drop the "Also=virtlockd.socket" line > from > libvirt.service (and "Also=virtlogd.socket" as well), or upgrade the > weak recommends to a depends for both packages.
It would additionally be nice know *what exactly* virtlogd/virtlockd are needed for (and thus, whether one really needs it or not)... so far, I seem to run fine without virtlockd (which I haven't installed, after it was split out). Cheers Chris.
