On 30.09.24 11:14, Simon McVittie wrote:
On Wed, 25 Sep 2024 at 22:42:44 +0200, Felix Geyer wrote:
It seems difficult to backport these changes to 1.2.
Yes, I suspect you're right.
What do you think about at least providing 1.4 in bookwork-backports?
I can upload that if you don't mind. It's working fine for me in bookworm
without
any changes.
The whole flatpak family usually backports relatively easily - they're
designed to have relatively light dependencies on anything outside that
immediate family of packages.
If flatpak-builder is something you use regularly, would you be able to
help to maintain it? I would welcome co-maintainers. I don't really use
it myself (other than for smoke-testing), so I'm only uploading it for
others' benefit. It's in the debian team on Salsa, so you probably have
commit access already.
Yeah, I use it somewhat regularly and am happy to help taking care of the
package.
And, for the more immediate question, if you can maintain flatpak-builder
in bookworm-backports for the lifetime of bookworm, please go ahead.
That sounds doable. I'll push a branch to Git and upload it to backports.
Cheers,
Felix
