Control: tags -1 -moreinfo Hey,
Thanks for your explanation. I missed the part, that the patch was added already. That makes sense to keep the bug open. regards, hefee -- On Dienstag, 1. Oktober 2024 22:20:47 CEST Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Hi, > > On 2024-10-01 22:10, Hefee wrote: > > Control: tags -1 +moreinfo > > > > Hey Aurelien, > > > > Can you please explain, why you see value in keeping this bug open for > > more > > than two years? I see no action item; aka nothing to do at the moment, > > just > > wait or do I miss something? > > There is a patch in the BTS to fix the issue. I am waiting for this bug > to be fixed either by applying the patch, or by an alternative solution. > > > So far I understood, that this bug may come again in future - okay - but > > every bug could come in future again, that in it self is not a reason to > > keep the bug open. Why not close this bug now and open it, if you see it > > again. > Uninitialized variables can come back even without changing the source > code, it depends for instance on how the compiler generate code and > place variables in memory. That's actually very likely how the testsuite > started to pass on riscv64. > > In short the bug is still there, just it is not visible anymore... for > now... > > > And the other reason that the riscv porter team needs this bug, you > > declined and actually removed it from there table. > > Yes, given the testsuite now passes on riscv64, it does not block the > port anymore. But the bug is still there. > > Regards > Aurelien
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
