On Sun, Sep 29, 2024 at 12:49:29AM +0200, gregor herrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 18 Jul 2024 08:46:00 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:
>
> > On 17-07-2024 11:20 p.m., gregor herrmann wrote:
> > > So I guess I'd just wait (the new libxml-libxslt-perl version also
> > > has no groundbreaking changes); but I might miss something which
> > > others may add.
> > I think that's acceptable if only warnings are involved indeed.
>
> Now we have libxml2 2.9 back in testing
> (2.12.7+dfsg+really2.9.14-0.1), and a libxml-libxml-perl which
> depends on this version and has been built against it, but the
> autopkgtest failures are still there:
> https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/libxml-libxslt-perl
> with our friend
> Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 209
> I wonder what still was compiled against libxml2 2.12 … One guess is libxslt
> which hasn't seen any upload or binNMU since July.
Um, seems to me that libxml-libxslt-perl itself needs a rebuild (and
possibly tighter dependencies) against the "new" libxml2 before it
can migrate?
(sid)# perl -we 'use XML::LibXSLT'
Warning: program compiled against libxml 212 using older 209
(sid)# objdump -p
/usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/perl5/5.38/auto/XML/LibXSLT/LibXSLT.so |grep libxml2
NEEDED libxml2.so.2
Apologies if I'm missing something :)
--
Niko
