Yavor Doganov wrote: > Thanks for the report but unfortunately we can't package it as the > current version sorts as higher:
Alternatively, we can package it as 1.06.dfsg+really1.1.0-1 (as ugly as it is) and keep this versioning scheme until upstream releases 1.7.0 (or 2.x), whenever that happens. This avoid the epoch bump and an upstream bump (which I happen to find ugly or at least unnatural). Alex, Riccardo, WDYT?