Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Dear all,
I really do hope to update the package to correct the FTBFS bugs, but
have unfortunately been too busy lately.
Please keep the package in unstable, as I really do hope to provide an
updated release that addresses these issues ASAP.
If anyone is available to help maintaining this package, I would much
appreciate help and would be very keen to assist with that task.
Otherwise, I will certainly get around to it myself, hopefully within
the next 6 months.
The bug fixes for these FTBFS issues should already be in our upstream
master branch <https://github.com/ecere/ecere-sdk/commits/master/>:
commit ca58cfa4e26e03271e32ee6aae3206956fdc26fd
Author: Jerome St-Louis <jer...@ecere.com>
Date: Wed May 20 07:25:49 2020 -0400
compiler/libec: Fixed multiple definitions issues breaking on GCC
10 without -fcommon
commit c94efd6390599a4a291b7fe8b3d2d62699247380
Author: Jerome St-Louis <jer...@ecere.com>
Date: Sun Sep 6 03:35:01 2020 -0400
compiler/bootstrap: Updated for GCC 10 Common fixes
commit ca58cfa4e26e03271e32ee6aae3206956fdc26fd
Author: Jerome St-Louis <jer...@ecere.com>
Date: Wed May 20 07:25:49 2020 -0400
compiler/libec: Fixed multiple definitions issues breaking on GCC
10 without -fcommon
and other fixes may also be available from our /latest/ branch
<https://github.com/ecere/ecere-sdk/commits/latest/>.
Thank you, and apologies for the delays in fixing these issues.
Kind regards,
-Jerome
On 9/9/24 7:06 AM, Helmut Grohne wrote:
Source: ecere-sdk
Severity: important
User:helm...@debian.org
Usertags: sidremove
Dear maintainer,
I suggest removing ecere-sdk from Debian for the following reasons:
* It accumulated 2 RC-bugs:
+ #898832: ecere-sdk: FTBFS on i386:
/usr/lib/gcc/i686-linux-gnu/7/include/stddef.h:435:78: error: syntax error
Last modified: 1 year, 2 months
+ #995050: ecere-sdk FTBFS with gcc 10
Last modified: 1 year, 4 months
* It is not part of bookworm or trixie and is not a key package.
This bug serves as a pre-removal warning. After one month, the bug will be
reassigned to ftp.debian.org to actually request removal of the package.
In case the package should be kept in unstable, please evaluate each of the
RC-bugs listed above.
* If the bug is meant to permanently prevent the package from entering testing
or a stable release, but this package should stay part of unstable, please
add a usertag:
userhelm...@debian.org
usertags NNN + sidremove-ignore
* If the bug no longer applies, please close it. If it is closed, check
whether the fixed version is correct and adjust if necessary.
* Is the bug really release-critical? If not, please downgrade.
* If the bug still applies, please send a status update at least once a year.
Once all of the mentioned RC bugs have been acted upon in one way or another,
please close this bug.
In case the package should be removed from unstable, you may reassign this
bug report:
Control: severity -1 normal
Control: retitle -1 RM: ecere-sdk -- RoM; rc-buggy
Control: reassign -1 ftp.debian.org
Control: affects -1 + src:ecere-sdk
Alternatively, you may wait a month and have it reassigned.
In case you disagree with the above, please add a wontfix tag to this bug.
Control: tags -1 + wontfix
Doing so will also prevent automatic reassignment.
Kind regards
A tool for automatically removing packages from unstable
This bug report has been automatically filed with little human intervention.
If the filing is unclear or in error, don't hesitate to contact
Helmut Grohne<hel...@subdivi.de> for assistance.
