[ greeting intentionally left out ]
Am 28.08.24 um 10:53 schrieb Andreas Tille:
I would like to salvage your package textdraw by following the Package
Salvaging procedur which is described in Developers Reference[1]. Your
package is fulfilling the following criteria for the salvage process:
- NMUs, especially if there has been more than one NMU in a row.
lol? There was only one for already dubious reasons.
- Bugs filed against the package do not have answers from the
maintainer.
What should I reply to a minor typo which could be fixed anytime but does not need to be
and a "bug" for cross-building for a package which does not need to be
cross-built since it's one gcc call?
- There are QA issues with the package.
For example?
I have created a repository inside the salvage-team space[2].
Remove it, please. Or at least directly put it into Debina WITHOUT EVEN MENTIONING ANY
"salvaging" BULLS*.
Your package showed up in the Bug of the Day[3] initiative.
I don't care. At all. There's useful stuff to do. This bug is the contrary.
Rene, as a personal note since we know for a long time: I know you are
doing great work on a lot of way more important packages. I simply
would love to see also those tiny, low maintenance packages available on
Salsa. Its a really great example for the newcomers that should be
attracted by the Bug of the Day initiative. Thanks a lot for all your
other work.
A personal note: If you did ask quite nicely I 'd have agreed. It might have
make sense.
This pure nonsensical bug is not that and therefore this is not senseful.
Rene
