* Andrey Rakhmatullin <w...@debian.org> [240828 11:54]: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 07:22:03PM +0200, Chris Hofstaedtler wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 18, 2024 at 06:55:03PM +0200, Paul Gevers wrote: > > > If mono should be removed > > That's the question that needs to be answered somehow, first.
> It got another FTBFS bug (#1075284) recently. I've just tried to check > which packages need mono, with `reverse-depends libmono-system4.0-cil` and > with dak and skipping libraries and mono-related stuff. Thanks for checking! > Looks like the main problem is keepass2. > > boogie - RFA, not in testing > dafny - RFA, not in testing > de4dot - dead upstream > gbrainy - not in testing > gnome-subtitles - not in testing > keepass2 - looks healthy upstream and in Debian > openmcdf - outdated in Debian but looks healthy upstream > quickroute-gps - unmaintained, there is some upstream activity > repetier-host - not in testing > smuxi - orphaned > xsddiagram - orphaned [..] > Overall, this doesn't look like a lot of work, *if* we decide to do it > (and we can file RM bugs for many broken and unmaintained leaf packages in > any case). Maybe we should at least remove packages like gtk-sharp3, which was removed from testing in September. I'm guessing the maintainers are long gone. gbrainy would need to go away with gtk-sharp3. And then we can see about other orphaned and dead users? Chris
