Stefano, Almost four week ago, I asked you for a reproducible example. Without one, I will have to close the bug report for lack of actual verifyability.
Regards, Dirk On 2 February 2005 at 19:05, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | Ciao Stefano | | On 1 February 2005 at 17:46, Stefano Simonucci wrote: | | On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 06:18 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote: | | > severity 293136 normal | | > tags 293136 + moreinfo | | > tags 293136 + upstream | | > thanks | | > | | > On 1 February 2005 at 12:28, Stefano Simonucci wrote: | | > | Package: libgsl0 | | > | Version: 1.1.1-1 | | > | | > Are you sure you used 1.1.1-1? That version is almost three years old ... | | > The current version is 1.6-1. | | | | Sorry. When I have sent the report I have also downgraded to can perform | | my calculations. Nevertheless the package with the problems that I have | | said is the 1.6-1. | | I sort-of suspected as much. | | | > | Severity: important | | > | | | > | I have a program that use the runge-kutta 4th order implicit method with | | > | variable step. Today I have upgraded libgsl0 and libgsl0-dev and the | | > | execution of my program is slowed down. It seems that the number of step | | > | (in the runge-kutta method) is enormously increased. | | > | | > Not necessarily a bug -- the old method may have been faulty or less | | > robust. Certainly not an important bug if it still works. | | > | | | | If the program is too slow (100 days instead of one day) many types of | | calculations becomes impracticable. | | Sure, I was merely suggesting that the program may have taken incorrect | shortcuts. | | But it probably is a bug upstream. COuld you distill a simple self-contained | example? That would help the gsl'ers. | | Best regards, Dirk | | | > Can you please try to provide a complete test case so that the gsl developers | | > actually have something to go by? Compiler versions etc pp would also | | > help. The GSL manual may have specific suggestions for gsl bug reports. | | > | | > As it currently stands, your bug report is a little vague. | | > | | > Regards, Dirk | | > | | | | Right! Maybe this is not a bug of the debian package. Thank you | | Best regards | | Stefano | | -- | Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise | answer to the wrong question. -- John Tukey as quoted by John Chambers -- Better to have an approximate answer to the right question than a precise answer to the wrong question. -- John Tukey as quoted by John Chambers -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
