Hi!

netstat-nat (in the form of #270932, untouched since 2004)
popped up in today's bug of the day (http://blends.debian.net/botd/botd.html).
This bug is cited as the cause of removal from testing.

I can absolutely reproduce the FTBFS,
but packages don't get to this state by accident.


The BOTD helpfully notes an uscan error. And indeed, 
www.tweegy.nl/projects/netstat-nat/ redirects to
www.tweegy.nl:5223/projects/netstat-nat/
which is a synology 404,
and http://www.tweegy.nl:5223/ is a synology login.

The internet archive has captured some old versions of this
  
https://web.archive.org/web/20180104143740/http://www.tweegy.nl/projects/netstat-nat/
signed as D.Wijsman da...@tweegy.nl.
I haven't found anything code-shaped under that name on today's web.

There's also a CVS tree linked, but all captures are 404s.
At least some tarballs are live.


The listed maintainer is
  Gustavo Paniagua dos Santos <paniagua.gust...@gmail.com>
and DDPO
  https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?email=paniagua.gustavo%40gmail.com
shows that this is his only package.

lists.d.o (if im using the search right, not a given)
  
https://lists.debian.org/cgi-bin/search?P=paniagua.gustavo%40gmail.com&DEFAULTOP=and&SORT=0&HITSPERPAGE=10&xFILTERS=.%7E%7E
shows his only activity to be
  2014-05  #748772: ITP: snetz
  2014-06  #553187: O: netstat-nat which he turned into an ITA
and that's it.

snetz saw one version (with him listed as Maintainer:)
and was removed from sid in 2020 (#963096).

netstat-nat saw one version as well ‒ 1.4.10-3 ‒
with him listed as Maintainer:.

Except for the ITP and ITA, I cannot see any debbugs activity in this
package, or any list activity in general,
and I can't see anything code-shaped
(that isn't derived from him being listed as the maintainer here)
under this name on the modern web.

I would happily call him MIA (because DOA would be untoward).


This feels like a program I badly reinvent de novo every six weeks,
and it's trivial to renovate it to bring it up to a modern standard
(much like I did with urlview and archivemount)
to not have to do that.

This would provide /an/ upstream,
and I can take it over in debian as well.
Maybe even test and fix #270932 because a 2004 bug is embarrassing.

Best,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to