Package: ftp.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: r-bioc-blus...@packages.debian.org, debia...@lists.debian.org, cru...@debian.org Control: affects -1 + src:r-bioc-bluster Control: block -1 by 1078961 Control: block 1076843 by -1 Tags: moreinfo User: ftp.debian....@packages.debian.org Usertags: remove
Dear FTP Team, As part of the Bioconductor 3.19 transition, the Debian R team agreed [0] to remove builds for 32-bit architectures (where possible) in line with upstream's cessation of support for 32-bit systems. Here is the 23rd such removal request, this time for r-bioc-bluster. `dak` complains about "r-bioc-scran" for which there is already a 32-bit removal bug. In my opinion, once the 32-bit packages for r-bioc-scran are removed, then removing the 32-bit packages for r-bioc-bluster should not cause a problem. $ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org "dak rm --architecture=armel,armhf,i386 --no-arch-all-rdeps --binary-only --partial --rdep-check --no-action r-bioc-bluster" Will remove the following packages from unstable: r-bioc-bluster | 1.12.0+dfsg-1 | armel, armhf, i386 Maintainer: Debian R Packages Maintainers <r-pkg-t...@alioth-lists.debian.net> ------------------- Reason ------------------- ---------------------------------------------- Checking reverse dependencies... # Broken Depends: r-bioc-scran: r-bioc-scran # Broken Build-Depends: r-bioc-scran: r-bioc-bluster (1.14.0 >=) Dependency problem found. --- Thanks! [0] https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2024/07/msg00033.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2024/07/msg00035.html https://lists.debian.org/debian-r/2024/07/msg00045.html -- Michael R. Crusoe
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
