On Sat, Jul 20, 2024 at 01:01:42PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote: > I am re-adding lea...@debian.org, and now also commun...@debian.org. I still > don't see this as an issue that the Technical Committee should decide. This > is aggressively confrontational behavior of one of the Debian kernel > maintainers, and it should be handled as that.
So this is a personal, not a technical problem. > - I am accepting the offer given in > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1065416#108 > to take over the linux-libc-dev package. > I will start working on that at DebCamp and DebConf. No. Also maybe you want to talk to dimitri.led...@canonical.com, as his question started all of this. > - Bastian's assertion that the current linux-libc-dev package doesn't > break anything in the archive, doesn't say anything. These bits > are just not used by anything in the archive. Ah, now we finally get somewhere. All of this is about non-Debian. > As you can see from the commits for the gcc-for-{build,host} changes, these > were done around the same time as this controversial linux-libc-dev upload. > So while having to fix one messy set of patches from Helmut, Bastian assumes > a no-reply on the linux-libc-dev issue as an OK, that's odd. This was a bug report at a source package you maintain. Did you not see it? Bastian -- Oblivion together does not frighten me, beloved. -- Thalassa (in Anne Mulhall's body), "Return to Tomorrow", stardate 4770.3.
