Hi, > > src:uwsgi-plugin-python3 > > building uwsgi-plugin-python3 > > building python3-uwsgidecorators > > building uwsgi-plugin-asyncio-python3 > > building uwsgi-plugin-gevent-python3 > > building uwsgi-plugin-greenlet-python3 > > building uwsgi-plugin-tornado-python3 > [...] > > Please confirm or comment, and I'll give it a go for python. > > The above looks good. Please create that, and test (e.g. with debdiff) > that it produces same binary packages as now generated with src:uwsgi > we can release that. No need to touch src:uwsgi at all for this work.
I'm there. https://salsa.debian.org/uwsgi-team/uwsgi-plugin-python Issues/questions: uwsgidecorators.py would make sense in this package but is not provided by uwsgi-src. OK to add it? My packaging only builds for the default python version. Should we plan for multiple python versions supported in sid? My view on this is to wait for the need to arise. If ok with this, src:uwsgi should probably clean out all the alternatives provided. You view on this? greenlet should be restricted to some archs, looking into that and considering specific source package. Advice? Please bring up any other comment you might have. Thanks, Alex
