Re: Luca Boccassi > > BEGIN BALLOT > > > > The Technical Committee declines to overrule the maintainer of > > base-files, or issue any advice on issues concerning /etc/os-release. > > > > We do not think there is a clear proposal on the table for us to assess, > > and we do not think it is appropriate to issue any general statements on > > the issues concerning /etc/os-release. > > Seriously? In https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1077764#368 > you say that you could rule on the general statement rather than a > specific implementation, then I answer "I'd prefer that if it was > possible", and this is how you respond? I've asked multiple times > exactly what it is that you need in order to make a decision, and all > I get in response are first cryptic and contradicting statements, and > then this abrupt dismissal. This seriously feels like something out of > Kafka novel.
I vote A > N. Luca: people would be much more likely to act positively on your requests if you wouldn't call them Kafkaesque. Christoph
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
