On 2024-08-05, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > On 2024-08-05, Chris Lamb wrote: >> Santiago Vila wrote: >> >>>> smartlist looks reproducible now >>> >>> Only on amd64, arm64 and i386. >> >> Ah, I didn't spot that. Unfortunately, I don't have armhf hardware to >> hand, but perhaps Vagrant can help narrow this down a little. > > I was not able to reproduce the issue in my test setup, though our test > infrastructure has consistently been showing unreproducibility since > 2020-09-24 on armhf. > > I think the original reported issue is definitely fixed, but there is > some other outstanding issue with armhf specifically... > > My hunch is differing kernel, as some of the armhf builds run with an > arm64 kernel and some with a regular armhf kernel... I will try to do > some more involved tests to verify if that is the issue.
Well, I was able to reproduce a difference running one build with an arm64 kernel one with an armhf kernel, but have not identified exactly what triggers the difference... It is not embedded kernel *version*, as that actually does vary on the amd64 tests.reproducible-builds.org infrastructure where it is consistently reproducible. I suspect there is some architecture-specific kernel-dependent difference. On second look, I am noticing the diffoscope differences include some references to __time64@plt ... live well, vagrant
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
