Package: gnucobol3 Version: 3.1.2-5+b1 Severity: normal Tags: upstream X-Debbugs-Cc: alexb...@gmail.com
Dear Maintainer, First, I thank you for taking the burden to package gnucobol. The mainstream project is advancing, and version 3.2 is currently stable. Also, there are new preview versions. I'm kindly asking you to package the newer versions. And put them in backports too. n.b. I did personaly fix some bug with the termux package, and noticed they even fixed one missing include in 3.2. only one of them. ;) -- System Information: Debian Release: 12.6 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable-security'), (500, 'proposed-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 6.7.12+bpo-rt-amd64 (SMP w/6 CPU threads; PREEMPT) Locale: LANG=C.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=C.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set Shell: /bin/sh linked to /usr/bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system) LSM: AppArmor: enabled Versions of packages gnucobol3 depends on: ii gcc 4:12.2.0-3 ii libc6 2.36-9+deb12u7 ii libcob4 3.1.2-5+b1 ii libcob4-dev 3.1.2-5+b1 ii libgmp-dev 2:6.2.1+dfsg1-1.1 ii libncurses-dev [libncurses5-dev] 6.4-4 gnucobol3 recommends no packages. gnucobol3 suggests no packages. -- no debconf information
