reopen 1003395 retitle plfit: under-the-radar numerical issue
Hi, I am re-opening the issue because it has simply gone under the radar but it is still there. The issue is a numerical issue that deserves an appropriate numerical analysis. The upstream code currently workarounds by using at some point `long double`. This is a very bad numerical practice: all the computation must be made with `double`. The issue is actually not numerically trivial. I am on my way to elaborate a numerical fix. Best wishes, Jerome -- Jerome BENOIT | calculus+at-rezozer^dot*net https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=calcu...@rezozer.net AE28 AE15 710D FF1D 87E5 A762 3F92 19A6 7F36 C68B
