Hi Hibby, On Thu, 2024-07-25 at 00:23 +0100, Hibby wrote: > Hi!
(..) > 1) On instance 0 (100.90.178.95), I added instance 1 (100.83.1.23) and > prepared. I get confirmed we have retested here. In general, you need to use the same hostname you see with API call ``status``. Using IPs for remotes (which itself show a ńormal hostname string via ``status``) yields to similar errors here. I.e., using proper hostnames (or same naming) everyhwere should solve the issue at hand. Whether this is desired behavior is another question. Definitely, error handling should be refined... Hth, S
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
