Florent Rougon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>From the names I'd say: patch-xdvi-370505 is not a good idea, IIRC the >> number is the xdvi bug number on sourceforge. patch-tmp makes sense > > Er, but there is currently a patch-xdvi-300109 and the bug number refers > to the *Debian* BTS.
Sorry, I thought that patch-xdvi-370505 was the number of the existing patch, you considered adding to it, and it was the xdvi bugnumber. I was wrong, so you were right to name the new patch after the Debian bug number. Regards, Frank -- Frank Küster Single Molecule Spectroscopy, Protein Folding @ Inst. f. Biochemie, Univ. Zürich Debian Developer (teTeX)
