On Jun 19, Ariel <asdeb...@dsgml.com> wrote: > I don't know how hard it would be, but perhaps sash should support xz along > with gzip. (And perhaps bzip2 as well.)
It would require taking something like minilzma and integrating it, but the big question is: what is the purpose of sash nowadays? I think that for just about all purposes it can be replaced by busybox-static. -- ciao, Marco
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
