Hi, On 17-07-2024 9:43 p.m., gregor herrmann wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 06:57:01 +0200, Paul Gevers wrote:The Release Team considers packages that are out-of-sync between testing and unstable for more than 30 days as having a Release Critical bug in testing [1]. Your package src:libxml-libxslt-perl has been trying to migrate for 31 days [2].This should fix itself once libxml-libxml-perl 2.0207+dfsg+really+2.0134-4 migrates (and libxml2).
That's a slight variant of "This is usually a missing *versioned* (test) dependency in your reverse (test) dependencies or a missing Breaks in this package or both. However, if this is *only* a test issue, it's possible that it's considered wrong to declare that in the package meta data; in that case reach out to the Release Team to ignore the apparent autopkgtest regressions for this case."So, should libxml-libxslt-perl have a versioned Depends on libxml-libxml-perl? Or vise versa, a versioned Breaks?
Paul
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
