Luca Boccassi <bl...@debian.org> writes: > On Mon, 29 Apr 2024 13:03:22 +1200 Andrew Bartlett <abart...@samba.org> > wrote: >> Just a warning that trying to brute force a fix for this is likely to >> end badly. A lot of developer time was spent to get to this current >> delicate situation, which relied on the narrow behaviour that is now >> eliminated by the Debian time_t 64 transition rules. >> >> Socket-wrapper starts with: >> >> /* >> * Make sure we do not redirect (f)open(at)() or fcntl() to their > 64bit >> * variants >> */ >> #undef _FILE_OFFSET_BITS >> >> This was added in >> > https://gitlab.com/cwrap/socket_wrapper/-/commit/bbe14cc3200ca553b13ed49357e2e88ba487eeaa >> >> Setting -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 will break the fcntl64 wrapper and so >> break Samba's tests. >> >> I don't know if there is a good fix for this actually. >> >> Andrew Bartlett > > How about simply dropping armv7 support from socket-wrapper and uid- > wrapper? Having architectures that are actually used being blocked by > these issues is suboptimal at best
Yes, I'm a bit uncertain how to fix these bugs, and lack time to debug it. If someone wants to help, please do! /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
